Reviews from AWS Marketplace
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
messaging backbone
What do you like best about the product?
Robust security features
strong features for on-premise enterprise ready messaging
extending features to include connectivity for cloud-native apps and container-based deployments
strong features for on-premise enterprise ready messaging
extending features to include connectivity for cloud-native apps and container-based deployments
What do you dislike about the product?
complexity of configuration for apps on non-IBM Cloud infrastructure
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
HA, resilient healthcare messaging
messaging backbone for ACE and IIB - robust Pub Sub and connectivity
strong support for security
evolving mechanisms for HA and DR
messaging backbone for ACE and IIB - robust Pub Sub and connectivity
strong support for security
evolving mechanisms for HA and DR
Recommendations to others considering the product:
the first implementation is not a steep learning curve
getting Security and HA integarated with existing or emerging Enterprise infrastructre can take some time and resources and iterations
getting Security and HA integarated with existing or emerging Enterprise infrastructre can take some time and resources and iterations
- Leave a Comment |
- Mark review as helpful
MQ Message Queue
What do you like best about the product?
Functional rich and easy to use; integration with lots of tools.
What do you dislike about the product?
Takes sometime to understand, but better than open source RabbitMQ
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Messaging Infrastructure for our EDI applications
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Very well recommended
Move data across multiple applications
What do you like best about the product?
Assures delivery of data across multiple applications.
What do you dislike about the product?
Not much to dislike, but tracing of messages could be simplified
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Move patient data across multiple clinical applications
MQ at RJ
What do you like best about the product?
Very mature and stable, applicance has improved DR and HA capabilities.
What do you dislike about the product?
Not great instrumentation out of the box
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Moving asycnronous data across differnt platforms
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Large enterprises with need to keep persistent messages should look into the applicance
More than messages and queues
What do you like best about the product?
MQ can be run on every operating system there is and allows you to send messages or data to anywhere else. It lets you send to multiple destinations too or can be used for publish and subscribe, you can even send to the cloud. Messages can be persistent so they are saved over a system crash.
What do you dislike about the product?
MQ means you have to connect to a queue and then send so if you only send one message thats two steps but if you want to send a lot of data it is easy to just keep sending.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Sending messages or data reliably from many places to one or many places.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
You can use it with cloud now :-)
MQ Review
What do you like best about the product?
Easy of installation and use. Flexibility. Fast start stop
What do you dislike about the product?
Lack of detailed logs without starting traceing
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Mq is takling to BPM, WAS, portal and BD2 in our agency's infrastructure.
VEry reliable
What do you like best about the product?
We use MQ to transfer hundreds of millions of messages reliably over zOs, Unix/linux and windows. 100+ application areas use MQ for both app to app messaging and for db2 replication. We have been using MQ for over 20 years.
What do you dislike about the product?
There isn't a great deal of issues that we have. probably an easy to use monitoring and alerting tool would be more useful.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
data replication, app to app messaging.
IBM MFT is good for our use case
What do you like best about the product?
MQ provides a decent solution for file transfers. Transfers are generally fast.
What do you dislike about the product?
MFT seems like a bit of an after thought at times. There are a not a lot of exciting features for MFT announced. We have had issues with bugs and transfers not going through but there doesn't seem to be logs written.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We need to move many large files across different platforms, data centers, and storage nodes. IBM MQ helps us to do this quickly and securely.
The best in messaging
What do you like best about the product?
I particularly like the robustness of MQ as a messaging solution for diverse applications on multiplatform
What do you dislike about the product?
I love everything that MQ offers and there is nothing that I dislike about MQ
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
INtegration
IBM MQ is a solid and established messaging middleware
What do you like best about the product?
As a 14+ year user of IBM MQ, the feature I like the most is the continuation of features available in the first versions.
What do you dislike about the product?
Beyond the basic functionality (queues, channels, listeners, etc) sometimes IBM MQ is not bug-free. An example is the use of multi-instance queue managers and NFS v4 shared file system.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have built an elaborate solution for a healthcare customer that uses MQ to carry messages from front-end systems to the back-end. Examples are a message when a patient is admitted to a hospital and when lab results are delivered to a doctor.
showing 131 - 140